|
MURRAYLANDS TWIN LOSS |
||
|
(Specialising in Twin Loss Educational Resources) |
||
|
|
Established Oct. 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the Reasons for Twin Loss
Important: This section
offers only basic information about some of the reasons for loss in a
multiple pregnancy. It is not meant to replace professional medical advice.
Further enquiries should be directed to either the contact groups listed on
the ‘links’ page of this site, or your own family doctor. This information is
published in the brochure ‘Some of the Reasons for Twin Loss’ by Murraylands
Twin Loss. © 2007. |
||
|
Reason: Vanishing
Twin Syndrome This
occurs early during a pregnancy when one twin seems to ‘disappear’ as a
result of spontaneous abortion. Fetal tissue is then ‘absorbed by the other
twin, the placenta, or the mother, thus giving the appearance that the twin
“vanished”’. (Parenting of Multiples, Jan. 2004. The syndrome is diagnosed
using ultrasound. The first scan will reveal two babies in the womb and the
subsequent visit will only show one. This of course can be extremely
distressing for the parents, but is often treated with indifference by many
medical personnel, family and friends. Accurate and credible information
regarding Vanishing Twin Syndrome in the past, has been difficult to find.
Thankfully due to increased attention being paid to this condition, the
resulting broader research, has now rectified this problem. References: Parenting of
Multiples, Jan. 2004, (online). Available:
http://multiples.about.com/cs/medicalissues/a/vanishingtwin.htm [Accessed 30
Mar. 2005]. Other
Useful Sites: Twin Loss NZ:
www.twinloss.org.nz OzMOST:
OzMOST_Admin@tpg.com.au |
||
|
Reason: Twin
to Twin Transfusion Syndrome This
is a disease of the placenta that ‘affects identical twin pregnancies’. (The
Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome Foundation, 2004). The common placenta
may contain abnormal blood vessels ‘which connect the umbilical cords and
circulation of the twins’ (The Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome
Foundation, 2004), or ‘the common placenta may also be shared unequally
by the twins’. (The Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome Foundation,
2004). This results in one twin receiving too many necessary nutrients for
survival and the other, too few. Although Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome
can appear at any time during the pregnancy, Chronic TTTS usually appears in
the early stages, whilst acute TTTS may occur during the latter stages,
including delivery. Chronic cases have relatively poor outcomes because the
babies have not had enough time to develop properly in the womb. Acute cases
have a higher survival rate but a greater chance of disabilities. References: The Twin to Twin
Transfusion Syndrome Foundation, 2004, (online). Available:
http://www.tttsfoundation.org.what%20is%20ttts.html [Accessed 30
Mar. 2005]. Other
Useful Sites: Australian Twin
To Twin Transfusion Syndrome Support Group www.twin-twin.org/links.htm |
||
|
Reason: Conjoined
Twins This
occurs in approximately every 4 out of 400,000 births. Survival rates are low
with one or both twins eventually dying. The majority of conjoined twins who do survive will either
be severely handicapped or have an
extremely reduced life span. Most conjoined twins are female and the majority
are stillborn. Surgical separation is extremely risky and success rates depend greatly upon where
the babies are joined. Babies joined at the rear of the head, on the side, at
the pelvis, or at the abdomen have the highest chance of survival, although
many complications such as brain damage for example may occur as a result of
separation. Babies joined at the front of the head and chest, often sharing
organs such as the heart, have not been known to survive. ‘Up until 1990,
surgical separation of conjoined twins has been attempted 167 times … the
babies that survive are truly miracle babies!’ (CTI, date unknown). References: CTI, date unknown,
Conjoined Twins Int. Facts, (online). Available:
http://www.conjoinedtwinsint.com/facts.htm [Accessed 30 Mar. 2005]. |
||
|
Reason: Multifetal Pregnancy
Reduction This is an extremely controversial medical procedure. ‘Reduction ... is usually
performed between the 10th and 12th weeks of pregnancy by injecting one or
more of the fetuses.’ (Haddon, L. P., date unknown). IVF and fertility drugs
have resulted in a much higher multiple pregnancy rate. Multifetal pregnancy
reduction is sometimes considered the
best course of action to increase the chances of a viable pregnancy. ‘The
timeframe for multifetal reduction … is often very narrow, sometimes as short
as only 3 or 4 days’ (Haddon, L. P., date unknown), thus placing parents
under greater stress and pressure when deciding whether to use this course of
treatment. Mostly used in the United States, particularly during the early
days of InVitro-Fertilization (IVF) when success rates were much lower, many
medical professionals now question the ethics of this procedure. ‘Pregnancy
loss subsequent to fetal reduction has been reported as ranging from 1 to
40%’ (Lipitz, S., 1999). References: Haddon, L. P., date unknown, Multifetal Pregnancy
Reduction, (online). Available: http://www.multiplebirthsfamilies.com/articles/ber_q11.html
[Accessed 3 Apr. 2005]. Lipitz, S., 1999, The First World congress on:
Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility, Prague, Czech Republic,
(online). Available: http:www.obgyn.net/firstcontroversies/prague1999lipitz.doc
[Accessed 30 Mar. 2005]. |
||
|
Reason: Twin
Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence (TRAP) A non hereditary condition
occurring in approx. 1% of identical twin pregnancies. One twin lacks a
functioning cardiac system and therefore receives blood from the normally
developing twin, called the “Pump Twin”. This places enormous demands upon
the Pump Twin’s heart, risking cardiac failure if left untreated. Surgery can
be carried out in the latter stages of pregnancy and success rates of up to
95% have been achieved in the United States in recent years. References: Philadelphia Children’s Hospital, Centre for Fetal
Diagnosis (online).
Available: http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp [Accessed 21
March 2007]. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||